<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marathonpacks &#187; Simon Reynolds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marathonpacks.com/tag/simon-reynolds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com</link>
	<description>someone warn the plains!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>This Helps Explain The Rise of Fleet Foxes, At Least</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2009/12/critical-consensus-in-the-noughties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2009/12/critical-consensus-in-the-noughties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marathonpacks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pitchfork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Reynolds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marathonpacks.com/?p=1409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simon Reynolds in the Guardian:
&#8220;See, I have this hunch. I reckon that if you were to draw up a top 2,000 albums of every pop decade and compare them, the noughties would win: it would beat the 1990s decisively, the 1980s handsomely, and it would thrash the 1970s and 1960s. But I also reckon that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon Reynolds <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2009/dec/07/musically-fragmented-decade/print">in the Guardian</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;See, I have this hunch. I reckon that if you were to draw up a top 2,000 albums of every pop decade and compare them, the noughties would win: it would beat the 1990s decisively, the 1980s handsomely, and it would thrash the 1970s and 1960s. But I also reckon that if you were to compare the top 200 albums, it&#8217;d be the other way around: the 60s would narrowly beat the 70s, the 70s would slightly less narrowly beat the 80s, the 80s would decisively beat the 90s, and the 90s would leave the noughties trailing in the dust. Yeah, it&#8217;s just a hunch – but it has the ring of truth. Because I think that the higher reaches of a chart of this kind demand something more than mere musical excellence: there has to be an X factor, the hard-to-define quality that you could call &#8220;importance&#8221; or &#8216;greatness&#8217;.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>He uses Pitchfork&#8217;s early-Noughties (I feel weird and British using that word) slant to its Best of the &#8217;00s list (<em>Person Pitch</em> being the only post-2005 inclusion) as the first bit of evidence.  Believe me, Pitchfork editors and staffers had an inkling that something like this would happen.</p>
<p>The most interesting part of this article is its conclusion&#8211;which, thankfully (and perhaps obviously, given its author) avoids the &#8220;they don&#8217;t make &#8216;em like they used to&#8221; argument.  Reynolds&#8217; contention is that, as the numbers of (often good) releases goes up, the critics themselves are spread thinner, and consensus inevitably declines, especially in comparison to earlier decades.  I actually had a bit somewhat similar to this in my own 00&#8217;s accompanying essay&#8211;a similar conclusion, but having more to do with the role of technologies and the incursion of non-critic-critics into this situation&#8211;but cut it, for various reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2009/12/critical-consensus-in-the-noughties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vee Throw Away Our Geetars Tomorrow Und Buy All Synthesizers!</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2009/10/vee-throw-away-our-geetars-tomorrow-und-buy-all-synthesizers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2009/10/vee-throw-away-our-geetars-tomorrow-und-buy-all-synthesizers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marathonpacks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Reynolds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synth-pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The new compact synths resembled an orchestra in a box; you didn&#8217;t need to have a whole band of instrumentalists. Suddenly pop was packed with duos who divided labour neatly between the composer-operator, and the singer-lyricist: Eurythmics, Yazoo, Tears For Fears, Blancmange, Pet Shop Boys. The shape of a synth-pop outfit was subversive, or at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;The new compact synths resembled an orchestra in a box; you didn&#8217;t need to have a whole band of instrumentalists. Suddenly pop was packed with duos who divided labour neatly between the composer-operator, and the singer-lyricist: Eurythmics, Yazoo, Tears For Fears, Blancmange, Pet Shop Boys. The shape of a synth-pop outfit was subversive, or at least enough to make rockists uneasy: the rock band&#8217;s gang-like structure replaced by same-sex &#8216;couples&#8217; plus the occasional female diva plus male boffin partnership.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Simon Reynolds, &#8220;<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/oct/10/synth-pop-80s-reynolds">One Nation Under a Moog</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>A concise survey/leadup to the forthcoming BBC doc <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNiGnTSrL5o">Synth Britannia</a>, which sounds awesome, and not just for the title alone.  Reynolds also makes note that Pink Floyd&#8217;s &#8220;On the Run&#8221; is something of a precursor to synthpop (using an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Music_Studios">EMS</a>)&#8211;at least putting synths on a really big stage.  I&#8217;d always considered it an interstitial between &#8220;Breathe&#8221; and &#8220;Time&#8221;, but listening to it all by itself is something different altogether:</p>
<p><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PByo5uqTezc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PByo5uqTezc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2009/10/vee-throw-away-our-geetars-tomorrow-und-buy-all-synthesizers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McLaren, et al</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2006/03/mclaren-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2006/03/mclaren-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marathonpacks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam & the Ants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bow Wow Wow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm McLaren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Reynolds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2006/03/mclaren-et-al.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McLaren on the set of the &#8220;Double Dutch&#8221; video, 1983 (source)
As should have been expected, I heartily enjoyed Simon Reynolds&#8217; thorough Rip it Up and Start Again, which was written with a mix of clarity and insight that allowed me to breeze through it in a few days.  The chapter that stuck with me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; width: 400px;" src="http://www.bobgruen.com/files/asst/R.148%20MALCOLM%20MCLAREN.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><span style="font-size:85%;">McLaren on the set of the &#8220;Double Dutch&#8221; video, 1983 (<a href="http://www.bobgruen.com/files/malcolmmclaren.html">source</a>)</span></p>
<p><strong>As should have been expected</strong>, I heartily enjoyed Simon Reynolds&#8217; thorough <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0143036726/sr=8-1/qid=1142915751/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-3276046-2415352?%5Fencoding=UTF8"><span style="font-style: italic;">Rip it Up and Start Again</span></a>, which was written with a mix of clarity and insight that allowed me to breeze through it in a few days.  The chapter that stuck with me the most was the one (&#8221;Sex Gang Children&#8221;) on Malcolm McLaren, the sleazy impresario who also happened to be a borderline savant capable of spotting subcultural trends half a decade before their tipping point.  I&#8217;ve always been interested in McLaren, and <span style="font-style: italic">Rip it Up </span>helped me connect a lot of dots.  It&#8217;s obvious to anyone who&#8217;s read <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415039495/sr=8-1/qid=1142914887/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-3276046-2415352?%5Fencoding=UTF8"><span style="font-style: italic;">Subculture</span></a>, no matter how much of its been disproven/updated, that the original British &#8220;punk&#8221; style was bricolage&#8212;cribbed from London immigrants and filtered through a working-class mentality.  McLaren turned it into high fashion, and was ready to do it again after the Sex Pistols imploded, which they were, of course, supposed to do all along.</p>
<p><strong>Adam and the Ants were</strong> McLaren&#8217;s first post-Pistols project.  They&#8217;d previously released the guitar-driven, solid post-punk <span style="font-style: italic;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0002BPIEA/sr=8-5/qid=1142915699/ref=pd_bbs_5/102-3276046-2415352?%5Fencoding=UTF8">Dirk Wears White Sox</a> </span>in 1979, which went nowhere fast, although it did feature &#8220;<span style="font-weight: bold;">Kick</span>&#8221; (<a href="http://marathonpacks.com/Files/02%20Kick.mp3">mp3</a>) which showed some small signs of what was to come.  After hiring McLaren, Adam was refigured as an Errol Flynn/Electric Warrior who also happened to be completely straight-edge.  He also happened to completely dislike McLaren, who kicked him out of his own band.  Adam came back a year later, though, with the wonderful <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0000025L7/sr=8-1/qid=1142915699/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-3276046-2415352?%5Fencoding=UTF8"><span style="font-style: italic;">Kings of the Wild Frontier</span></a>, by which time he&#8217;d taken at least one cue from McLaren and internalized his own relationship with the media, resulting in &#8220;<span style="font-weight: bold;">Press Darlings</span>&#8221; (<a href="http://marathonpacks.com/Files/05%20Press%20Darlings.mp3">mp3</a>), on which he (Ray Davies steez) refers to rock-crit <a href="http://makemyday.free.fr/frendz.htm">Nick Kent</a> as &#8220;the best-dressed man in town&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>McLaren, in the meantime</strong>, had taken the former Ants and put them behind his latest, as Reynolds writes, &#8220;truly pliable human material&#8221;, fourteen-year-old <a href="http://www.annabellalwin.com/images/annabella_lwin003.jpg">Annabella Lwin</a>.  Bow Wow Wow would serve as McLaren&#8217;s poster children for both his latest musical fascination&#8211;all forms of highly rhythmic African musics&#8211;and his latest ideological/promotional one, the record industry&#8217;s grip on music distribution.  Thus, BWW&#8217;s first cassette, <span style="font-style: italic;">C30, C60, C90, Go!<span style="font-style: italic;"> </span></span>was released with one side blank, to encourage home taping (get it)?  Soon after was the <span style="font-style: italic;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00000GCA2/102-3276046-2415352?v=glance&amp;n=5174">Your Cassette Pet EP,</a> </span>which contained the great &#8220;<span style="font-weight: bold;">Louis Quatorze</span>&#8221; (<a href="http://marathonpacks.com/Files/01%20Louis%20Quatorze.mp3">mp3</a>) and &#8220;<span style="font-weight: bold;">Fools Rush In</span>&#8221; (<a href="http://marathonpacks.com/Files/03%20Fools%20Rush%20In.mp3">mp3</a>), both of which mirror, primitively, the irresistible polyrhythmic sound that Byrne and Eno were brewing up at the same time.  Let us not forget, however, that McLaren was also a pedophile scumbag, as evidenced by this passage from <span style="font-style: italic;">Rip it Up</span>:</p>
<blockquote><p>McLaren threw himself into &#8220;training&#8221; the three male members of the group&#8230;with a nocturnal regime of whoring in Soho&#8217;s red-light district&#8230;Because the fourteen-year-old Annabella initially had problems fitting in with a bunch of men who were much older, McLaren even persuaded the guys that the problem was her virginity.  To get her out from under her mother&#8217;s sway and make her commit to the group, one of them had to do the dirty and deflower the underage singer.  Reluctantly, the band drew lots, and guitarist Matthew Ashman was dispatched to perform the task.  He failed.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><span style="font-style: italic;">Rip it Up </span>doesn&#8217;t cover it</strong>, but I&#8217;ve always had a soft spot for McLaren&#8217;s 1983 paean to New York hip-hop/DJ culture <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000001FVW/sr=8-1/qid=1142915545/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-3276046-2415352?%5Fencoding=UTF8"><span style="font-style: italic;">Duck Rock</span></a>.  Again, it&#8217;s only nominally McLaren&#8217;s&#8211;he only did what he did best and organized the talent.  But when it works, it&#8217;s <span style="font-style: italic;">fantastic</span>.  Essentially geared as an extended all-request radio show, it features the great &#8220;<span style="font-weight: bold;">Legba</span>&#8221; (<a href="http://marathonpacks.com/Files/06%20Legba.mp3">mp3</a>) and &#8220;<span style="font-weight: bold;">Double Dutch<span style="font-weight: bold;">&#8221; </span></span><span><span>(<a href="http://marathonpacks.com/Files/03%20Double%20Dutch.mp3">mp3</a>)<span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span></span>which charted as a single, got some early MTV videoplay and features some toasting by McLaren himself.  It&#8217;s his last shot to fully indulge his clear affinity for African diasporic culture, and he wisely steps aside and lets the music speak for itself.<br />
</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2006/03/mclaren-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

