<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 50 of the Nineties Part 5 (10-1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-5-10-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-5-10-1/</link>
	<description>someone warn the plains!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:04:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bazz</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-5-10-1/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2005/10/top-50-of-the-nineties-part-5-10-1.html#comment-89</guid>
		<description>An interesting list; even though I&#039;ve never been the world&#039;s biggest Radiohead fan (can&#039;t stand them, to be honest), I don&#039;t think OK Computer is a bad choice for #1 album of the 90s.  A couple of albums that might have merited consideration in your top 50 are Rancid&#039;s &quot;...And Out Come the Wolves&quot; and Hole&#039;s &quot;Live Through This&quot; (Better, IMHO, than most of what Ms. Love&#039;s husband and his friends were up to).  Anyway, good job on the list - I enjoyed reading it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting list; even though I&#8217;ve never been the world&#8217;s biggest Radiohead fan (can&#8217;t stand them, to be honest), I don&#8217;t think OK Computer is a bad choice for #1 album of the 90s.  A couple of albums that might have merited consideration in your top 50 are Rancid&#8217;s &#8220;&#8230;And Out Come the Wolves&#8221; and Hole&#8217;s &#8220;Live Through This&#8221; (Better, IMHO, than most of what Ms. Love&#8217;s husband and his friends were up to).  Anyway, good job on the list &#8211; I enjoyed reading it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just PETE</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-5-10-1/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>just PETE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2005/10/top-50-of-the-nineties-part-5-10-1.html#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Sweet, sweet redemption.  I swear I was the only person who still held Digable Planets &quot;Refutin&#039;...&quot; in sacred space.  When I mention it, people say, &quot;Well, rap music has been using jazz loops for years.&quot;  Well, no they haven&#039;t and, anyway, it&#039;s so much more than that.  It&#039;s much more flow-etry than rap. Never again duplicated.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nice choices.  I haven&#039;t look at the other 40, but sure hope you had Public Enemy: Apocalypse 91.   Also great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet, sweet redemption.  I swear I was the only person who still held Digable Planets &#8220;Refutin&#8217;&#8230;&#8221; in sacred space.  When I mention it, people say, &#8220;Well, rap music has been using jazz loops for years.&#8221;  Well, no they haven&#8217;t and, anyway, it&#8217;s so much more than that.  It&#8217;s much more flow-etry than rap. Never again duplicated.</p>
<p>Nice choices.  I haven&#8217;t look at the other 40, but sure hope you had Public Enemy: Apocalypse 91.   Also great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgpop</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-5-10-1/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>cgpop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2005/10/top-50-of-the-nineties-part-5-10-1.html#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Echoing the praise.  Great job (again) with the album list.  I will definitely be picking up some of these that I have overlooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Echoing the praise.  Great job (again) with the album list.  I will definitely be picking up some of these that I have overlooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-5-10-1/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2005/10/top-50-of-the-nineties-part-5-10-1.html#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Bravo Eric, excellent job on the top 50!&lt;br/&gt;Ok Computer is not anticlimatic or over obvious, in fact it is admirable that you stuck to what you believe in &amp; acknowledged an album that is a cornerstone for rock n roll, one that no band has ever come close to &amp; one that is still relevant today..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo Eric, excellent job on the top 50!<br />Ok Computer is not anticlimatic or over obvious, in fact it is admirable that you stuck to what you believe in &#038; acknowledged an album that is a cornerstone for rock n roll, one that no band has ever come close to &#038; one that is still relevant today..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

