<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 50 of the Nineties Part 1 (50-41)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-1-50-41/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-1-50-41/</link>
	<description>someone warn the plains!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:04:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-1-50-41/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2005/10/top-50-of-the-nineties-part-1-50-41.html#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Regarding &quot;Down Here on the Sound&quot;: FYI, there&#039;s a typo on the liner notes.  The song that Tribe sampled is actually called &quot;Down Here on the Ground,&quot; and it&#039;s on Grant Green&#039;s album &quot;Alive!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding &#8220;Down Here on the Sound&#8221;: FYI, there&#8217;s a typo on the liner notes.  The song that Tribe sampled is actually called &#8220;Down Here on the Ground,&#8221; and it&#8217;s on Grant Green&#8217;s album &#8220;Alive!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoss</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-1-50-41/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2005/10/top-50-of-the-nineties-part-1-50-41.html#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I saw a show once where Ice Cube saw Busta Rhymes on Scenario and was like &quot;Who&#039;s that!&quot;. That video probably broke up &quot;Leader&#039;s of the New School&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;Busta with his &quot;RAOWW RAOWW, like a dungeon dragon. Change ya&#039; little drawers &#039;cause ya pants be saggin&#039;&quot;&lt;br/&gt;Album is a sound track to my life my the Bronco II. Okay that is a little broad. Maybe a soundtrack to some of my life in my Bronco II ocassionaly:-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a show once where Ice Cube saw Busta Rhymes on Scenario and was like &#8220;Who&#8217;s that!&#8221;. That video probably broke up &#8220;Leader&#8217;s of the New School&#8221;.<br />Busta with his &#8220;RAOWW RAOWW, like a dungeon dragon. Change ya&#8217; little drawers &#8217;cause ya pants be saggin&#8217;&#8221;<br />Album is a sound track to my life my the Bronco II. Okay that is a little broad. Maybe a soundtrack to some of my life in my Bronco II ocassionaly:-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whb</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-1-50-41/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>whb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2005/10/top-50-of-the-nineties-part-1-50-41.html#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see New Adventures in Hi-Fi get some love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see New Adventures in Hi-Fi get some love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marathonpacks</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-1-50-41/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>marathonpacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2005/10/top-50-of-the-nineties-part-1-50-41.html#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Obviously a big Brit Pop fan, D!  Thanks for the comment.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;While I would probably be convinced further on Pulp, they&#039;re a shadow of their &quot;Different Class&quot; selves, from a popularity perspective.  As we all know, they had an established career well before the early/mid 90s, and got caught up in the NME-fueled storm.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Second, I don&#039;t consider The Tears to be that different from Suede, and my definition of &quot;claimed the lives&quot; is a flippant reference to commercial viability outside of a certain period of time.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Finally, I definitely wouldn&#039;t consider Oasis or Gene to be anywhere near the popular saturation point they were during that period of the 90&#039;s, due to the fact that they weren&#039;t able to sufficiently mature their sound like Blur or Supergrass.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I realize my grammar was a little off there--thanks for the clarification!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously a big Brit Pop fan, D!  Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>While I would probably be convinced further on Pulp, they&#8217;re a shadow of their &#8220;Different Class&#8221; selves, from a popularity perspective.  As we all know, they had an established career well before the early/mid 90s, and got caught up in the NME-fueled storm.  </p>
<p>Second, I don&#8217;t consider The Tears to be that different from Suede, and my definition of &#8220;claimed the lives&#8221; is a flippant reference to commercial viability outside of a certain period of time.  </p>
<p>Finally, I definitely wouldn&#8217;t consider Oasis or Gene to be anywhere near the popular saturation point they were during that period of the 90&#8217;s, due to the fact that they weren&#8217;t able to sufficiently mature their sound like Blur or Supergrass.  </p>
<p>I realize my grammar was a little off there&#8211;thanks for the clarification!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.marathonpacks.com/2005/10/top-50-of-nineties-part-1-50-41/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.132.200.226/~marathon/mpax/2005/10/top-50-of-the-nineties-part-1-50-41.html#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Comment to #45.. you state &quot;Along with Blur, survivors of the “Brit-Pop” era that claimed the lives of so many bands unable to transcend the tag (Oasis, Pulp, Suede, Sleeper, Gene, and on and on).&quot; Not sure what you mean by transcend the tag or claimed the lives? Are you saying the Brit Pop era claimed the lives of (Oasis, Pulp, Suede,Gene,Sleeper)? &lt;br/&gt;Pulp was all over the map &amp; were constantly reinventing themselves (transcending the tag?) from the dark &#039;Freaks&#039; to &#039;Seperations&#039; (acid house) to the glam, synth theatrical &#039;His n Hers&#039; &amp; &#039;Different Class&#039; to the dark, artsy, and at times trip hop &#039;This Is Hardcore&#039; to the organic, less synth, warm &#039;We Love Life&#039;.... &amp; what about Jarvis Cocker&#039;s solo project &#039;Relaxed Muscle&#039; which combined the glammy Pulp with Suicide....&amp; Cocker is talking about getting Pulp back together..&lt;br/&gt;And what about Oasis... their life has not been claimed. they are still going strong. &amp; Suede too now just in another name The Tears &amp; Gene is still going strong best to my knowledge - remember 2002&#039;s beautiful &#039;Libertine&#039;..... the only one out of the list is maybe Sleeper that had their life claimed by the Brit pop era.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment to #45.. you state &#8220;Along with Blur, survivors of the “Brit-Pop” era that claimed the lives of so many bands unable to transcend the tag (Oasis, Pulp, Suede, Sleeper, Gene, and on and on).&#8221; Not sure what you mean by transcend the tag or claimed the lives? Are you saying the Brit Pop era claimed the lives of (Oasis, Pulp, Suede,Gene,Sleeper)? <br />Pulp was all over the map &#038; were constantly reinventing themselves (transcending the tag?) from the dark &#8216;Freaks&#8217; to &#8216;Seperations&#8217; (acid house) to the glam, synth theatrical &#8216;His n Hers&#8217; &#038; &#8216;Different Class&#8217; to the dark, artsy, and at times trip hop &#8216;This Is Hardcore&#8217; to the organic, less synth, warm &#8216;We Love Life&#8217;&#8230;. &#038; what about Jarvis Cocker&#8217;s solo project &#8216;Relaxed Muscle&#8217; which combined the glammy Pulp with Suicide&#8230;.&#038; Cocker is talking about getting Pulp back together..<br />And what about Oasis&#8230; their life has not been claimed. they are still going strong. &#038; Suede too now just in another name The Tears &#038; Gene is still going strong best to my knowledge &#8211; remember 2002&#8217;s beautiful &#8216;Libertine&#8217;&#8230;.. the only one out of the list is maybe Sleeper that had their life claimed by the Brit pop era&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

